open popup

Blog

The truth is, there are millions of blogs, and it's impossible to keep up with everything that matters. There's never enough time to read, comment, and participate in discussions. Yet, when there's something too good to pass up, we will share observations, thoughts, and ideas about Health Services, Healthy Living and Health Technology. Check back periodically; it will never be boring.

Social Media in Crisis

Kriste Goad
CMO, ReviveHealth

For anyone still wondering about the value of social media in health care, just look at the latest examples in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings and wonder no more.
 
Each of the three hospitals that treated the majority of the bombing victims –Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center – used their Facebook pages and Twitter feeds to communicate everything from the number and condition of bombing victims in their care, to a call for blood donations, to what hospital employees should do about trying to come to work amid a citywide lockdown.
 
Not that long ago, when a gunman fired shots inside one of UPMC’s hospitals in Pittsburg, the health system used its Twitter feed to instantly communicate to the public about what was going on inside the hospital and that hospital workers and patients were safe.
 
When it comes to being prepared for a crisis, having a communication plan is essential, and nowadays, having social media be a part of that plan, is critical.

Read more

Exchange Networks (Finally) Coming Into Focus

Brandon Edwards
CEO, ReviveHealth

The last few weeks have finally started to bring the exchange networks into focus, especially when we consider a patchwork of data points and stories from across the country.  It’s sort of like staring at a poster covered in dots – after some period of time, you see a B1 bomber, or whatever image is hidden in the dots.

First, let’s consider what we’re hearing from health systems in different markets.  Negotiations for hospital participation in the exchange networks is starting to yield contracts around the country.  Most are being done at payment rates slightly below existing commercial rates, with most reported discounts under 10 percent.  This has been confirmed by Carl MacDonald, our favorite analyst at Citi who covers the payor space.  The highest profile example is Tenet Healthcare (THC), which just announced three separate agreements in three markets with three different Blues plans.  The recent analyst report from Sheryl Skolnick states that Tenet signed deals which included discounts slightly less than 10 percent in aggregate – hardly the Medicare rates some payors have aggressively promoted to the market. Here’s how Sheryl describes the impact of these deals, and the others that will follow:  

1. The contracts are at slight (or even modest) discounts to commercial rates. Given the delta between commercial and Medicare rates, even a 10% discount could yield a revenue per adjusted admit that is still 30% higher (or more) than Medicare (assume a commercial rate of $14,000 per adj. admit and Medicare around $10,000 and do the math).
2. IF those patients had shown up before, they would have been no-pay heads. Now, they could yield substantial margins. THAT’s the important upside.
3. IF those patients show up, the limitations on co-pays and deductibles for subsidized individuals on exchanges substantially limits ‘balance after insurance’ bad debts. If no patients show up, then no harm, no foul. They’ll show up somewhere else as insured patients, but not at THC hospitals as uninsured, i.e., NOT as negative cash flow events for THC’s facilities.
4. The contracts set a precedence for other contracts, at least potentially, and prove the point that although some managed care plans might wish for Medicaid rates, the hospitals (at this point at least) aren’t necessarily compelled to grant them. (Of course, that sets up a very worrisome dynamic in our mind for those unfortunate plans.)
5. So yes, the contracts might fill beds, but they’d fill the beds at acceptable margins no matter who else is in the network. Unlike in the past when hospitals exchanged price for volume (mid–90s for those of you too young to remember), this is NOT a conversion of the SAME patients from being highly profitable to highly unprofitable. In our estimation, THIS IS a conversion of ‘no-pay’ patients to either ‘no show’ patients or nicely profitable ones.  

Beyond Tenet’s smart strategic play, we recently learned of another deal just about to be signed – at similar rates and with similar steerage protections – by an HCSC-owned Blue Cross plan with a multi-hospital statewide health system.  There is definitely a pattern emerging here, and it’s a clarion call for any hospital considering Medicare or near-Medicare rates: don’t do it.  There are good deals to be done, at rates close to commercial.  
 
With that backdrop, let’s consider the second piece of the puzzle – what the health plans are telling the market.  Most people have seen Aetna’s exchange network offer of 100% of Medicare in trade for complete exclusivity, which Aetna reports has been adopted by numerous hospitals nationwide.  Yet a source close to the action tells us that Aetna has signed up a grand total of five hospitals in the entire country to that deal.  It seems that even promises of complete exclusivity won’t lure smart, high-quality hospitals to an exchange network paying Medicare rates.  Perhaps that’s why Aetna quietly, and without any media announcements, laid off more than 1,200 people in several waves over recent months.  Enrollment is down and the exchange opportunity isn’t as glittery for them as once thought.

WellPoint has made similar claims in recent days  – just last week, a Barclay’s analyst report coming out of their annual investor conference said:

“With Dennis Matheis, who runs exchanges, joining Wayne DeVeydt this morning we spent a good amount of time on exchanges. WellPoint believes that the government is on track for exchange implementation in 2014. The company believes its scale, brand advantage, and local presence make it well positioned to win enrollment.  WellPoint expects to get a lot more clarity on market positioning over the next 8 weeks, with notably California rates due on March 31st.   [WellPoint] is still in the early stages of exchange contracting, and is seeing rates closer to Medicare than commercial, while ‘No one is interested In Medicaid.’ The company is 1/3 to 1/2 done contracting depending on the market. On average, WellPoint sees rate shock of 40 percent, with variability in states depending on current market reforms. WellPoint sees the exchange opportunity as a land grab, where it needs to take advantage of the early opportunity to diversify risk, and it could take 5-7 years to catch up. The company is expecting employer dumping to be low.”

These claims simply defy our experience and all market intelligence.  That’s why we are fielding a quick survey to take the pulse of hospitals in WellPoint markets – we’re going straight to the source to validate or discredit WellPoint’s claims.  We certainly don’t want false information to create a sense of urgency for hospitals to do the wrong deals on exchange networks.   

No doubt WellPoint and other payors want hospitals to believe that Medicare rates are their only option.  They want to create a sense of scarcity and desperation.  And no doubt it’s working with some hospitals.  Yet the truth is different – rates close to commercial are available for those hospitals serious about doing the right deals.  The exchanges can be a success if health plans and hospitals alike approach exchange negotiations as commercial negotiations.

Stay tuned for more information on this topic.

Read more

More Than More of the Same

Robert Berra
Chief Strategy Officer, ReviveHealth

The annual HIMSS conference can be overwhelming, and this year’s experience in New Orleans was no different. More than 1,100 vendors came together in the hope of capturing the imagination (and business) of potential clients, vendor collaborators, investors and of course, the media. In years gone by it was easy to put HIT companies into their respective buckets:

     

  • Enterprise-wide solutions designed to capture clinical and administrative data for large health systems
  • Best of breed, niche players:
    • Point-of-care decision support
    • E-prescribing
    • Operating room information systems
    • EHR systems:
      • Hospital based
      • Physician based
      • Consumer based
  • Revenue cycle; back-office solutions, etc.

Today, through years of acquisition activities, it’s becoming increasingly challenging to differentiate the players, and it’s probably going to get worse before it gets better.

There was an aura of sameness that permeated the conference – everyone positioning themselves to be everything to everyone, trying to get into health care reform alignment.

Additionally, the industry is still being challenged to prove its promise and value in the health care delivery and cost management equations.

For buyers of HIT services, this has to be very confusing times. For firms like ours, though, these are the challenges we live for – helping create marketplace differentiation, competitive separation and buyer preference for our clients.

Read more

Wellness as a Brand Strategy

Kriste Goad
CMO, ReviveHealth

If Budweiser can encourage the world to “Drink Responsibly” with a straight face, there’s absolutely no reason why Coca-Cola can’t tackle the world’s obesity problem with a promise to “Market Responsibly.”

Big brands know better than anyone that social responsibility is not just some feel-good, nice-to-have initiative, but rather a business imperative. Now health is moving to the forefront of that agenda as the intensity of the world’s health issues push to the top of mind and top of the media’s agenda.  

Consider John Commins’ latest HealthLeaders article comparing the food industry to Big Tobacco. Commins makes the case that it’s time for health care providers to lead the fight against the food industry.

“The sad truth is that wellness movements by themselves aren’t enough to reverse the obesity and overweight epidemic, no matter how well-intentioned or proactive. They will fail unless we address the larger issue of what people eat. The processed food industry must be held accountable and pressured to modify the addictive junk it peddles to the American people. Healthcare providers, the people who see first-hand the devastating effects of overweight and obesity, must lead this fight.”

Commins’ call to action comes on the heels of a string a high-profile stories in the nation’s leading news publications detailing food industry tactics to sell more food that’s not necessarily contributing to our country’s good health.

An interesting trend, however, is how non-health care companies are positioning themselves as ambassadors of good health.

When it comes to the “new black” of corporate social responsibility, wellness is very clearly the new green.  A real focus on sustainability and “green” practices is now being supplemented by a real focus on health and wellness. A healthier bottom line is increasingly being tied to a brand association with healthier habits, healthier choices and healthier lifestyles.

Wellness as a business strategy is finding all kinds of odd and disruptive bedfellows. Smart communications and marketing executives are recognizing the connection. Read more here. 

 

Read more

Narrow Networks: Stand Up and Stand Out

As part of our periodic guest blog series, Cliff Frank, president of Partnera Partners, elaborates on ways hospitals can connect with consumers and drive brand loyalty in the face of narrow networks and changing financial models.

***************************************************************************************************************************

Cliff Frank
CEO, PartneraHealth

2014 is our year. It’s the year when Provider Brands become important to a whole new class of insurance buyers – just about everybody. If your hospital or physician group is stuck inside a broad payor network, you will simply be drowned out by the cacophony of insurance electioneering called open enrollment. But you have a brand of your own. This makes you the main event because you want consumers to make a health care decision, not merely a financial one. Your loyal patients can find you and meaningfully show their love for you by enrolling in a plan that features you. But to Stand Out, you have to Stand Up.

Stand Up means deciding you are going to abandon the myth that insurers will market you to their customers so that their customers become your customers. That hasn’t worked in broad networks; why would it work in narrow networks any better? Insurers don’t want patients. That’s the whole point. They want members who are not patients, and are not likely to be patients. They speak a different language to a different group of prospects.

Stand Up means deciding to control your growth through expanding your relationship with consumers while they are still vertical, so when they need to be horizontal in a facility, they have already affiliated with your brand. Connecting with consumers is a process, not an event, but it starts when you Stand Up to accept the responsibility to drive the process.

Stand Up means not accepting insurer demands for more discounts, preferred pricing, and leverage against other providers. Instead, you can go directly to individuals, businesses and other entities with your own insurance products on the exchange, off the exchange, or through defined contribution alternatives. You don’t have to own the product, you don’t have to own the risk, but you do have to own and operate a clinically efficient and effective network that produces superior clinical outcomes over time.

Stand Out means eliminating the background noise of too many confusing alternatives for the purchaser – whether they are individuals, small groups, or any other entity that buys health insurance. Stand Out means defining the decision consumers are going to make as a health care decision, not just an insurance or financial choice.

Stand Out means reaching out to consumers now to become their reference point for health care financial matters. Create a center where you can inform them about health plans you favor, you trust, and that you believe will behave honorably to your patients.

Stand Out means building consumer loyalty programs that continuously connect them to your health system each time they interact with it. Make your brand relevant to consumers more often, more deeply.

Stand Out means building new access points for non-scheduled care outside of the Emergency Room, so that consumers can find you in a moment of need, and stick with you for life.

The Narrow Network conversation is an opening to build a consumer relationship with your brand. And your brand will Stand Out when consumers find you, stick to you, and love you, year after year. Consumer loyalty is the annuity platform for your future that can be adapted to whatever payment model evolves. Stand Up and Stand Out!

Cliff Frank is president of Partnera Partners, LLC, and CEO of PartneraHealth, which helps healthcare organizations become more consumer-focused by increasing access, reducing costs and engaging the consumer before they get sick. Learn more at www.partnerahealth.com or contact Cliff directly at cliff.frank@partnerapartners.com.

 

Read more
View Next